← InsightsBorrower-side commercial finance analysis · US & Canada

Your Cheapest Capital Is a Discount You Cannot Afford to Take.

Financing StrategyBorrower Advisory

Trade credit is the largest source of financing in most businesses, and the only one nobody negotiates on rate. It still has a rate. It is just written as a discount instead.

Take an illustrative case. A specialty food distributor does $18 million of revenue. Over the last two years three of its largest accounts moved from net 30 to net 60, which is ordinary large-buyer behaviour and is not going to reverse. Days sales outstanding went from 30 to 52.

The arithmetic on that is unforgiving. At 30 days, receivables tie up $1.48 million. At 52 days they tie up $2.56 million. The extension put an additional $1.08 million into accounts receivable, permanently, without a single new customer.

That money came from somewhere, and where it came from is the other side of the business.

It is worth saying that this is not a collections failure. QuickBooks reported in 2026 that nearly three in five small businesses have at least some invoices running thirty days or more past due. Terms extend, payment runs late against the extended terms, and the working capital requirement grows on both counts. A business can chase every invoice competently and still watch the number climb, because the driver is structural rather than administrative.

The discounts that stopped being taken

The distributor buys roughly $8.1 million a year from suppliers offering 2/10 net 30: two percent off for paying within ten days instead of thirty.

Two percent of $8.1 million is $162,000 a year. The company takes none of it, and has not for two years, because paying twenty days earlier on $8 million of purchases requires cash it no longer has. Nobody made that decision in a meeting. It happened one invoice at a time.

Annualized value of a 2/10 net 30 discount against the cost of a working capital line Two horizontal bars on a common scale to 40 percent. Taking a 2 percent discount for paying twenty days early is worth 37.2 percent annualized, shown in the darkest navy as the value argued. A working capital line used to fund that early payment costs about 9 percent all in. The spread between them is 28.2 points. WORKING CAPITAL Your Cheapest Capital Is a Discount You Cannot Afford to Take. Annualized, on 2/10 net 30 terms: two percent off for paying twenty days early, against the cost of funding it. The discount you are not taking The line that would fund it 37.2% 9.0% 28.2 points of spread The most common terms in business, priced like the debt they are. Source: Illustrative construction, arithmetic shown in the article | Thalos Capital Research Thalos Capital ©

What a two percent discount is actually worth

This is where trade credit stops looking like a payment term and starts looking like debt.

Paying on day ten rather than day thirty means funding an invoice twenty days early. In exchange, you pay 98 cents instead of a dollar. That is a two percent return on the 98 cents you actually advanced, earned over twenty days.

Annualize it. Two divided by ninety-eight is 2.04 percent. Multiplied by the 18.25 twenty-day periods in a year, it is 37.2 percent. The United States Treasury’s own prompt payment methodology values 2/10 net 30 at roughly 36.7 percent, which is the same number arrived at slightly differently.

There is nothing exotic here. It is the most common set of terms in business, and it is worth more than almost any return the company will generate operationally.

What it costs to fund

A working capital line at an illustrative 9 percent all-in.

The company does not need to borrow $8.1 million. It needs to cover twenty days of accelerated payment on $7.94 million of discounted invoices, which is an average outstanding balance of about $435,000 across the year. At 9 percent that is roughly $39,000 of interest.

Against $162,000 of captured discounts, the net is about $123,000 a year. The same figure arrives per invoice: financing 98 cents for twenty days at 9 percent costs 0.48 percent of face value, against a 2 percent discount, so every discounted invoice nets about 1.5 percent.

Where the cash went, and what it cost
One term change, two years, three numbers
Nothing here was decided in a meeting. Three large accounts moved to net 60, receivables absorbed the difference, and the payables side quietly stopped taking discounts one invoice at a time.
Days sales outstanding, 30 to 52
+22 days
Three large accounts moving from net 30 to net 60. No new customers, no collections failure.
Additional receivables to fund
$1.08M
On $18M of revenue, the extension moved AR from $1.48M to $2.56M and left it there.
Supplier discounts forgone each year
$162,000
Two percent on $8.1M of purchases bought on 2/10 net 30. Funding it costs about $39,000.
The third number is the one that never appears in the accounts. A discount not taken produces no line item and no variance; the company pays the amount printed on the bill, which was always the amount printed on the bill. It is the only cost here that is invisible, and it is the one worth $123,000 a year net.
Source: Illustrative construction, arithmetic shown in the article | Thalos Capital Research Thalos Capital ©

Why it does not get done

Three reasons, and none of them is that the arithmetic is hard.

The first is that the discount is invisible in the accounts. A discount not taken produces no line item, no invoice and no variance. The company simply pays the full amount, which was always the number on the bill. Nothing is ever reported as lost.

The second is that the cause and the cost sit in different places. The receivable extension happened in sales, to keep three large accounts. The consequence lands in payables, months later, as an inability to pay early. Nobody connects them because nobody owns both.

The third is that the facility gets evaluated against the wrong thing. A 9 percent line looks expensive next to a business that has always funded itself from cash flow. It looks very different next to a 37 percent return it exists to capture.

How Thalos Capital Approaches This

Thalos Capital works borrower-side on working capital from $50 thousand to $100 million and above, across the United States. The starting point is the cash cycle rather than a facility size: where cash leaves, when it returns, what stretched, and what the stretch is costing in places that are not labelled as costs.

That analysis usually produces a number the business has never calculated, because it is the sum of things that never appear as expenses. Discounts forgone. Purchases made at list because a deposit could not be funded. Volume declined on terms that could not be carried. Those are real, they are quantifiable, and they are what a facility gets sized against.

A line drawn at 9 percent to capture a 37 percent return is not a company borrowing because it is short. It is a company buying something worth considerably more than it costs. The distributor above has spent two years financing three large customers at zero percent while declining $162,000 a year to do it.

Most financing situations have more options than the borrower initially sees. A conversation is enough to map them. Submit your financing request at https://thaloscapital.com/contact.

Ready to map your options?
Most financing situations have more options than the borrower initially sees.
A conversation is enough to map them.
Submit your financing request →
Explore our financing solutions
Equipment FinancingWorking CapitalAsset-Based LendingStrategic Debt